Risk Assessment

A risk assessment analysis was carried out for each of the items listed and as required in accordance with the SARSA Manual. The steps set out in the Manual are as follows:

Step 1: Estimate the Possible Crash Frequency

Each of the listed items was assessed in terms of the frequency of crashes at each location, based on a “do nothing” approach. The table below defines the frequency of events.

Table 4-1: Possible Crash Frequency

FREQUENCY

DEFINITION

Frequent

One or more per month

Probable

One or more per year (but less than one a month)

Occasional

Once every one to three years

Remote

Less frequent than once in three years

Step 2: Estimate the Possible Crash Severity

Following the frequency of each event, the severity of those crashes were assessed using the severity indicators as set out in the table below:

Table 4-2: Possible Crash Severity

SEVERITY or OUTCOME

EQUIVALENT CRASH OUTCOME

EXAMPLES

Catastrophic

Likely multiple deaths

High Speed Vehicle crash on Freeway Car runs into crowded bus stop

Bus and petrol tanker collide

Serious

Likely death or serious injury requiring hospitalisation

High or medium speed vehicle / vehicle crash

High or medium speed collision with fixed roadside object

Pedestrian or cyclist struck by car

Minor

Likely minor injury

Low speed vehicle crash Cyclist falling from bicycle

Left-turn rear end crash in a slip lane

Negligible

Likely trivial injury or property damage only

Some low speed vehicle crashes Pedestrian walks into object

Car reverses into post

Road Safety Appraisal Report, Provincial Road 15-1

Step 3: Determine the level of Risk

Based on the outcomes of Steps 1 & 2 above, level of risk was determined in the Matrix shown in the table below:

Table 4-3: Level of Risk

 

FREQUENCY

Frequent

Probable

Occasional

Remote

SEVERITY

Catastrophic

Intolerable

High

High

Medium

Serious

High

High

Medium

Medium

Minor

High

Medium

Medium

Low

Negligible

Medium

Medium

Low

Low

Step 4: Determine a Course of Action

The course of action for each of the Items was then determined from Table 4-4:

Table 4-4: Course of Action

RISK

SUGGESTED TREATMENT ACTION

Intolerable

The safety concern “must” be corrected, even if the cost is high.

High

The safety concern “should” be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, even if the treatment cost is high

Medium

The safety concern “should” be corrected or the risk significantly reduced, if the treatment cost is moderate, but not necessarily high

Low

The safety concern “should” be corrected or the risk reduced if the treatment cost is low.